Urteil und kairozentrische Welt

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
An inquiry into the structure of human judgment in Modernity since Kant. In drawing on authors such as Fichte and Hölderlin, Nietzsche and Frege, Kafka and Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Schmitt, Davidson, Rorty and Deleuze, the study attempts to recuperate the notion of judgment from its inherited aporia between metaphysical and antimetaphysical models. The aim is to draft a model of judgment for our present that accounts for the whole spectrum of situations in which judgment shows its relevance -- whether we are determining a metaphor in a poem, a course of action, a specific interpretive view on history, or a sentence in court.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic; electronic resource; remote
Extent 1 online resource.
Publication date 2010
Issuance monographic
Language German

Creators/Contributors

Associated with Klinger, Florian
Associated with Stanford University, Department of Comparative Literature
Primary advisor Berman, Russell A, 1950-
Primary advisor Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich
Thesis advisor Berman, Russell A, 1950-
Thesis advisor Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich
Thesis advisor Bohrer, Karl Heinz, 1932-
Thesis advisor Nightingale, Andrea Wilson
Advisor Bohrer, Karl Heinz, 1932-
Advisor Nightingale, Andrea Wilson

Subjects

Genre Theses

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Florian Klinger.
Note Submitted to the Department of Comparative Literature.
Thesis Ph. D. Stanford University 2010
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2010 by Florian Klinger
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...