Affective Polarization Amplifies Ideological Polarization

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Uncovering the causes and foundations of increasing political polarization poses a pressing open problem to all social sciences. Here, we report results from an online experiment with a representative sample of the US population, deployed the week before the 2020 US presidential election, to analyze the role of affective polarization and social identity in facilitating ideological polarization at the individual level. Participants were incentivized to predict policy-sensitive statistics a year after the election conditional on its outcome. To update their initial predictions, individuals select or exogenously obtain factually similar articles on the respective topics curated from differently slanted news sources. We employ "political groupiness'' as an empirical measure for individual susceptibility for affective polarization, using behavioral experiments from the economic literature on social identity. We find political groupiness to be systematically associated with ideological polarization, as the partisan biases in both the demand for and processing of information is significantly amplified for groupy subjects. Our results suggest that ideological polarization is founded, at least partly, in the social identity roots of partisanship. Reducing the salience of intergroup distinctions by delabeling information sources decreases the partisan bias in information demand but not in information processing.

Description

Type of resource text
Date created August 13, 2021

Creators/Contributors

Author Bauer, Kevin
Author Chen, Yan
Author Hett, Florian
Author Kosfeld, Michael
Organizer of meeting Exley, Christine
Organizer of meeting Marquina, Alejandro Martínez
Organizer of meeting Niederle, Muriel
Organizer of meeting Roth, Alvin
Organizer of meeting Vesterlund, Lise

Subjects

Subject economics
Genre Text
Genre Working paper
Genre Grey literature

Bibliographic information

Access conditions

Use and reproduction
User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY).

Preferred citation

Preferred citation
Bauer, K., Chen, Y., Hett, F., and Kosfeld, M. (2022). Affective Polarization Amplifies Ideological Polarization. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at https://purl.stanford.edu/zd394zj9776

Collection

Contact information

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...