Fighting for Choice.
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- This essay won or received an honorable mention for The Boothe Prize for excellence in first-year writing. The Boothe Prize recognizes and rewards outstanding expository and argumentative writing by undergraduate students in the first-year Writing and Rhetoric classes, Integrated Learning Environments, and Thinking Matters programs. In each award-winning essay, student writers demonstrate clarity of argument, excellent integration of research-based evidence, and compelling prose style. In this essay, Vienna Kuhn discusses the vast implications that prenatal testing for Down syndrome has had in recent years, as well as the oftentimes flawed and biased ways doctors explain prenatal test results.
Description
| Type of resource | text |
|---|---|
| Date created | 2017 |
Creators/Contributors
| Author | Kuhn, Vienna G. |
|---|---|
| Advisor | Felt, Lindsey |
Subjects
| Subject | Program in Writing and Rhetoric |
|---|---|
| Subject | Down syndrome |
| Subject | prenatal testing |
| Subject | disability |
| Genre | Article |
Bibliographic information
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
Preferred citation
- Preferred Citation
- Kuhn, Vienna G. and Felt, Lindsey. (2017). Fighting for Choice. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: https://purl.stanford.edu/xk829hq9256
Collection
Boothe Prize Winners, Stanford University
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksContact information
- Contact
- pwrcourses@stanford.edu
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...