Social media sensitivity : probing heterogeneity across people, places, platforms, types of use and time

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Recent research suggests that the relationship between social media use and wellbeing is heterogeneous and multifaceted. This dissertation examines five potential sources of this heterogeneity: user's psychological dispositions (e.g., tendency for psychological vulnerability), the physical and social context of use (e.g., where and around whom use is occurring), the platform that is being used (e.g., Instagram, YouTube), the type of use that is occurring (e.g., passive active) and time domains (e.g., hours, weeks and months). I deploy random-slope multilevel models to analyze two large corpuses of experience sampling data collected from young adults (N=3,233; Observations= 219,027). Results reveal small but persistent associations between social media use and wellbeing outcomes that are moderated by a range of variables. Psychologically vulnerable people tend to feel worse after using social media as compared to psychologically healthy people. Using social media in social locations and around others is associated with negative wellbeing outcomes, but these results differ across platforms. Both passive and active social media use is associated with increased wellbeing outcomes at the within-person level but decreased wellbeing outcomes at the between-person level. Lastly, some evidence suggests that social media's effects on wellbeing accumulate steadily over time instead of "drenching" users in the moments after use has occurred. Theoretically, my dissertation provides empirical support for three key theories -- Digital Wellbeing as a Dynamic Construct, Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model and The Complementarity-Interference Framework. More broadly, results from dissertation suggest that blanket legislation on social media companies might be less effective than promoting tools that bolsters' users agency over their social media use.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2023; ©2023
Publication date 2023; 2023
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Vaid, Sumer
Degree supervisor Harari, Gabriella
Thesis advisor Harari, Gabriella
Thesis advisor Hancock, Jeff
Thesis advisor Matz, Sandra C
Thesis advisor Ram, Nilam
Thesis advisor Reeves, Byron, 1949-
Degree committee member Hancock, Jeff
Degree committee member Matz, Sandra C
Degree committee member Ram, Nilam
Degree committee member Reeves, Byron, 1949-
Associated with Stanford University, School of Humanities and Sciences
Associated with Stanford University, Department of Communication

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Sumer Vaid.
Note Submitted to the Department of Communication.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2023.
Location https://purl.stanford.edu/ww598pg2211

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2023 by Sumer Vaid
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC-ND).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...