Between present and future : on the temporality of educational goals

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Contemporary educational practice and policy are dominated by certain assumptions about how time, children's learning and their good are connected. These assumptions are rarely questioned, and it seems that we often lose any sense of how practice and policy could be grounded in different and better ones. Specifically, learning time is unreflectively assumed to be a limited resource, usually a scarce one, to be used as effectively and efficiently as possible by teachers in order to promote particular educational goals, and the realization of these goals - e.g., skills, knowledge, mental dispositions, moral attitudes - is assumed to take place only in the more or less remote future. Following these assumptions, children's present experience, their here-and-now, is treated as meaningful only in so far as it serves a future achievement. In other words, educational time tends to become almost exclusively a "time on-task" and the child is commonly viewed as a deficient version of the educated adult he is supposed to become. Ultimately, teaching and learning on these assumptions is liable to turn into a form of training, losing what is uniquely "educational" about them. Further, children and youth cease to be respected as persons in their own right: they become mere means to the pursuit of rigidly predetermined future-ends. My dissertation asks how can education be conducted so that the present of the child, his here-and-now, is given attention, thought meaningfully about, and ultimately respected while his future is not neglected or predetermined but viewed with genuine and open-ended hope. The dissertation is composed of four papers. The main concern of the first two papers is the possibility and challenge of educationally appreciating the present and in a way it is a critique or at least a call for a reexamination of goal setting in schools and elsewhere. I show that a focus on children's interests and on the ephemeral characteristic of education have the potential to free learning and teaching from reductive instrumentalism. The next two papers add to this critique, but from another perspective, that of hope for a favorable future. The main questions asked in these papers are -- how can we teach without letting our hope harm or disrespect the child? And how can we educate in a way that inspires hope without determining in advance the hoped-for future? Here, I draw on Gabriel Marcel's and Jonathan Lear's analysis of the phenomenon of hope. Ultimately, I hope to show that appreciation for the present is compatible with a hopeful future-orientation as long as the educator views this future as truly open. Then, education can become a genuine alternative to an exclusive instrumental training and socializing.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2018; ©2018
Publication date 2018; 2018
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Zipory, Oded
Degree supervisor Callan, Eamonn
Thesis advisor Callan, Eamonn
Thesis advisor Labaree, David F, 1947-
Thesis advisor McDermott, Ray (Raymond Patrick), 1946-
Degree committee member Labaree, David F, 1947-
Degree committee member McDermott, Ray (Raymond Patrick), 1946-
Associated with Stanford University, Graduate School of Education.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Oded Zipory.
Note Submitted to the Graduate School of Education.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2018.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2018 by Oded Zipory
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...