Attending to all we elicit : student skepticism of dialogic practices and stances

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
The way teachers organize classroom talk matters for the way students make sense of texts. Dialogic teaching (Alexander, 2004), a pedagogical approach that centers on student talk and sensemaking, represents a promising, albeit rare (Nystrand, 1997), alternative to instruction that is dominated by the teacher's voice. Beyond a few exceptions (Christoph & Nystrand, 2001; Aukerman et al., 2008), studies rarely offer detailed accounts of how teachers negotiate dialogic relationships with students. This dissertation offers one such account, documenting how I, as a practitioner- researcher (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993), enacted dialogic teaching with a group of seventh graders in a series of small-group text discussions. In my first findings chapter, I explore how students' contestation of my revoicings (O'Connor & Michaels, 1993) challenged pre-conceived notions of how dialogic talk moves function with students. My second findings chapter focused on how students responded to one another's claims to be textual authorities (Aukerman, 2007). My findings suggest that dialogic teaching not only involves responding to the highly contingent nature of students' textual interpretations, but also to their interpretations of the relational aspects of this teaching, particularly the power imbued in these relationships. It also suggests that student criticality is not always text-centric, but can be directed at the pedagogical context - and is sometimes voiced in-the-moment of instruction. Thirdly, my findings suggest that student criticality was not the sole possession of individual students, but was something that emerged in dialogue, a collective critical awareness of how my dialogic pedagogy was sought to position students

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2020; ©2020
Publication date 2020; 2020
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Aiello, Liam
Degree supervisor Aukerman, Maren (Maren Songmy)
Degree supervisor Martínez, Ramón, 1972-
Thesis advisor Aukerman, Maren (Maren Songmy)
Thesis advisor Martínez, Ramón, 1972-
Thesis advisor Williamson, Peter, 1968-
Degree committee member Williamson, Peter, 1968-
Associated with Stanford University, Graduate School of Education

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Liam Aiello
Note Submitted to the Graduate School of Education
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2020
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2020 by Liam Aiello
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...