Identifying bias in human and machine decisions

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Many suspect that decisions in employment, college admissions, lending, and the criminal justice system are systematically biased against certain groups. To date, efforts to provide statistical support for these concerns are often hampered by subtle statistical flaws that are known to affect popular tests for discrimination. The first part of this dissertation introduces these tests and their flaws, before proposing two new statistical tests for discrimination. The threshold test uses a hierarchical Bayesian model to identify the standards that decision-makers apply to different protected groups, while risk-adjusted regression aims to determine whether observed differences in treatment are justified by legitimate policy goals. Decisions aided by machine learning algorithms have also come under scrutiny for bias. As humans use machines to inform more and more consequential decisions, it is becoming crucial to understand how bias might occur in algorithmic systems. The study of identifying bias in algorithmic decisions is young, and many of the initial approaches suffer from the same statistical limitations as tests for bias in human decisions. The second part of this dissertation explores these approaches to algorithmic fairness, demonstrates their deficiencies, and provides a framework for the development of fair algorithmic decisions. Throughout this dissertation we apply our methods to large datasets from the US criminal justice system, studying citizens' interactions with the police and defendants' interactions with the courts. Despite this criminal justice focus, our work is applicable to studying bias in any domain, whether the decisions are made by humans or algorithms.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2018; ©2018
Publication date 2018; 2018
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Corbett-Davies, Samuel James
Degree supervisor Bernstein, Michael S, 1984-
Degree supervisor Goel, Sharad, 1977-
Thesis advisor Bernstein, Michael S, 1984-
Thesis advisor Goel, Sharad, 1977-
Thesis advisor Jurafsky, Dan, 1962-
Degree committee member Jurafsky, Dan, 1962-
Associated with Stanford University, Computer Science Department.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Samuel James Corbett-Davies.
Note Submitted to the Computer Science Department.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2018.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2018 by Samuel James Corbett-Davies

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...