What motivates people to try to persuade others? Ironic and contradictory determinants of advocacy

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
This dissertation explores various factors that influence advocacy. When people seek support for a cause, they typically present the strongest arguments they can muster. The current research departs, however, in identifying the conditions under which (and processes through which) presenting weak arguments can stimulate greater advocacy. Chapter 1 examines this ironic predictor of advocacy. This research also explores the impact of people's lay theories about attitudes on advocacy. People vary in the extent to which they believe attitudes are fixed (entity theorists) or malleable (incremental theorists). Results indicate that entity theories of attitudes simultaneously motivate and demotivate willingness to try to persuade others. Chapter 2 explores the contradictory ways in which these lay theories affect advocacy.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic; electronic resource; remote
Extent 1 online resource.
Publication date 2014
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Associated with Akhtar, Omair
Associated with Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
Primary advisor Tormala, Zakary L
Primary advisor Wheeler, S. Christian
Thesis advisor Tormala, Zakary L
Thesis advisor Wheeler, S. Christian
Thesis advisor Shiv, Baba, 1960-
Advisor Shiv, Baba, 1960-

Subjects

Genre Theses

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Omair Akhtar.
Note Submitted to the Graduate School of Business.
Thesis Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2014.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2014 by Omair Akhtar
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...