Human-computer conflicts in partially-automated driving

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Computer systems with independent agency that directly act on the environment or influence behaviors and beliefs now mediate our interactions with the ambient environment—influencing what we believe, and what we can do. We will increasingly come in to conflict with such systems, even if they are helping us pursue our superordinate desires. Moral conflicts, without an objectively correct solution, present a complex challenge and demand empirical investigation as to how people will cope with a human-computer moral conflict, so to inform the design of such systems. To study human-computer moral conflicts, a full-vehicle driving simulator was used to elicit naturalistic driver responses in a set of moral conflict situations, where the computer would steer the participant towards greater danger to self, or would protect them by steering towards vulnerable others. Participants fought more strongly against the computer when it pushed participants towards greater danger to themselves and less when it steered them towards vulnerable others when collisions were impossible and time was available to evaluate the situation and act against the computer's actions. In a time-pressured situation where a collision was inevitable, participants fought more strongly against the system when it steered them to strike a person, and less when it pushed them towards a barrier that would injure them. Ultimately, the circumstances of the situation, time available, and level of perceived threat greatly influence fighting against a computer's actions in the moment, and thus systems need to be designed carefully, as supervisory control may be difficult or impossible in critical situations.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2019; ©2019
Publication date 2019; 2019
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Miller, David Bryan
Degree supervisor Reeves, Byron, 1949-
Thesis advisor Reeves, Byron, 1949-
Thesis advisor Bailenson, Jeremy
Thesis advisor Harari, Gabriella
Thesis advisor Monin, Benoît, 1972-
Degree committee member Bailenson, Jeremy
Degree committee member Harari, Gabriella
Degree committee member Monin, Benoît, 1972-
Associated with Stanford University, Department of Communication.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility David Miller.
Note Submitted to the Department of Communication.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2019.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2019 by David Bryan Miller
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...