A new way to think about press freedom : networked journalism and a public right to hear in the age of "Newsware"
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- This dissertation presents a new way to think about press freedom in the context of online, networked news production. Essentially, if individual freedom means something other than just being left alone, and if press freedom is anything other than an anachronism from a time when only a privileged few could print or broadcast, then there is a democratic reason to defend press freedom and networked press dynamics to be discovered. To be free, people still need relationships with others and a right to hear -- conditions that are, ideally, guaranteed in part by an autonomous press. The need for freedom remains, but the press is negotiating its autonomy in new ways: distancing itself from and depending upon publics, markets and states through online networked infrastructures I call "newsware". I begin by unpacking the idea of autonomy as a general philosophical and democratic concept. I trace autonomy through a number of democratic rationales and situate it within an institutional understanding of the democratic press and an affirmative interpretation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. I then use Bourdieu's Field Theory and New Institutionalism to show how the press can be understood as a field and use this model to trace how the mainstream press has historically negotiated its autonomy. Focusing on contemporary dynamics of online news production, I identify a new type of infrastructure called "newsware" through which the press negotiates its autonomy today. My empirical investigation focuses on one type of newsware: news organizations' application programming interfaces (APIs) that give publics access to their content. I present what I believe to be the first integrated account of three leading news organizations' APIs (The New York Times, The Guardian, and National Public Radio) and identify three ways in which they use them to negotiate distance from and dependences upon software programmers and internet users. I conclude by claiming that this new way of thinking about press autonomy--as a set of negotiated separations and dependencies among distributed actors connected through newsware infrastructures--better lets us both define and defend the press as an ideal networked institution that ensures a public right to hear.
Description
| Type of resource | text |
|---|---|
| Form | electronic; electronic resource; remote |
| Extent | 1 online resource. |
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Issuance | monographic |
| Language | English |
Creators/Contributors
| Associated with | Ananny, Michael Joseph |
|---|---|
| Associated with | Stanford University, Department of Communication. |
| Primary advisor | Glasser, Theodore Lewis |
| Thesis advisor | Glasser, Theodore Lewis |
| Thesis advisor | Bailenson, Jeremy |
| Thesis advisor | Jain, Sarah S. Lochlann, 1967- |
| Thesis advisor | Turner, Fred |
| Advisor | Bailenson, Jeremy |
| Advisor | Jain, Sarah S. Lochlann, 1967- |
| Advisor | Turner, Fred |
Subjects
| Genre | Theses |
|---|
Bibliographic information
| Statement of responsibility | Mike Ananny. |
|---|---|
| Note | Submitted to the Department of Communication. |
| Thesis | Ph.D. Stanford University 2011 |
| Location | electronic resource |
Access conditions
- Copyright
- © 2011 by Michael Joseph Ananny
- License
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...