A Qualitative Study of Physicians' Various Uses of Biomedical Research

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract

Objective
To​ ​investigate​ ​the​ ​nature​ ​of​ ​physicians’​ ​use​ ​of​ ​research​ ​evidence​ ​in​ ​experimental​ ​conditions​ ​of open​ ​access​ ​to​ ​inform​ ​training​ ​and​ ​policy.
Design
This​ ​qualitative​ ​study​ ​was​ ​a​ ​component​ ​of​ ​a​ ​larger​ ​mixed-methods​ ​initiative​ ​that​ ​provided​ ​336 physicians​ ​with​ ​relatively​ ​complete​ ​access​ ​to​ ​research​ ​literature​ ​via​ ​PubMed​ ​and​ ​UpToDate,​ ​for one​ ​year​ ​via​ ​an​ ​online​ ​portal,​ ​with​ ​their​ ​usage​ ​recorded​ ​in​ ​web​ ​logs.​ ​Using​ ​a​ ​semi-structured interview​ ​protocol,​ ​a​ ​subset​ ​of​ ​38​ ​physician​ ​participants​ ​were​ ​interviewed​ ​about​ ​their​ ​use​ ​of research​ ​articles​ ​in​ ​general​ ​and​ ​were​ ​probed​ ​about​ ​their​ ​reasons​ ​for​ ​accessing​ ​specific​ ​articles​ ​as identified​ ​through​ ​their​ ​web​ ​logs.​ ​Transcripts​ ​were​ ​analyzed​ ​using​ ​a​ ​general​ ​inductive​ ​approach.
Setting
Physician​ ​participants​ ​were​ ​recruited​ ​from​ ​and​ ​registered​ ​in​ ​the​ ​United​ ​States​ ​(U.S.).
Participants
Thirty-eight​ ​physicians​ ​from​ ​16​ ​U.S.​ ​states,​ ​engaged​ ​in​ ​22​ ​medical​ ​specialties,​ ​possessing​ ​more than​ ​one​ ​year​ ​of​ ​experience​ ​post-residency​ ​training​ ​participated.
Results
Twenty-six​ ​participants​ ​attested​ ​to​ ​the​ ​value​ ​of​ ​consulting​ ​research​ ​literature​ ​within​ ​the​ ​context of​ ​the​ ​study​ ​by​ ​making​ ​reference​ ​to​ ​their​ ​roles​ ​as​ ​clinicians,​ ​educators,​ ​researchers,​ ​learners, administrators,​ ​and​ ​advocates.​ ​The​ ​physicians​ ​reported​ ​previously​ ​encountering​ ​what​ ​they experienced​ ​as​ ​a​ ​prohibitive​ ​paywall​ ​barrier​ ​to​ ​the​ ​research​ ​literature​ ​and​ ​other​ ​frustrations​ ​with the​ ​nature​ ​of​ ​information​ ​systems,​ ​such​ ​as​ ​the​ ​need​ ​for​ ​passwords.
Conclusions
The​ ​findings,​ ​against​ ​the​ ​backdrop​ ​of​ ​growing​ ​open​ ​access​ ​to​ ​biomedical​ ​research,​ ​indicate​ ​that​ ​a minority​ ​of​ ​physicians,​ ​at​ ​least​ ​initially,​ ​is​ ​likely​ ​to​ ​seek​ ​out​ ​and​ ​use​ ​research​ ​and​ ​do​ ​so​ ​in​ ​a variety​ ​of​ ​common​ ​roles.​ ​Physicians’​ ​use​ ​of​ ​research​ ​in​ ​these​ ​roles​ ​has​ ​not​ ​traditionally​ ​been​ ​part of​ ​their​ ​training​ ​nor​ ​part​ ​of​ ​the​ ​considerations​ ​for​ ​open​ ​access​ ​policies.​ ​The​ ​findings​ ​have implications​ ​for​ ​educational​ ​and​ ​policy​ ​initiatives​ ​directed​ ​toward​ ​increasing​ ​the​ ​effectiveness​ ​of this​ ​access​ ​to​ ​and​ ​use​ ​of​ ​research​ ​in​ ​improving​ ​the​ ​quality​ ​of​ ​health​ ​care.

Description

Type of resource text
Date created 2017

Creators/Contributors

Author Maggio, Lauren A.
Author Moorhead, Laura L.
Author Willinsky, John M.

Subjects

Subject physician
Subject biomedical research
Subject open access
Subject training
Subject policy
Subject education
Subject health care
Genre Article

Bibliographic information

Access conditions

Use and reproduction
User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY).

Preferred citation

Preferred Citation

Maggio,​ ​L.,​ ​Moorhead,​ ​L.,​ ​&​ ​Willinsky,​ ​J.​ ​(2017).​ ​​A​ ​qualitative​ ​study​ ​of​ ​physicians’​ ​varied​ ​uses​ ​of biomedical​ ​research.​ ​​BMJ Open​ ​(British​ ​Medical​ ​Journal),​ ​6(11).
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012846

Collection

Graduate School of Education Open Archive

View other items in this collection in SearchWorks

Contact information

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...