The form and function of legal precedent

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
This dissertation is composed of three distinct but related papers on stare decisis or legal precedent, and employs both empirical and theoretical methods to examine the topic. The first chapter contributes to our understanding of which methods for following precedent do relatively better or worse to serve the values of stare decisis, and under what conditions. The second chapter takes up the precedential value of dissenting opinions, arguing that dissents contribute to the formation of binding precedent in a particular type of plurality decision. The third chapter—through a quantitative, computational study of judicial decisions—reveals substantial and statistically significant relationships between the style of a judicial opinion and its legal influence or precedential power.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2018; ©2018
Publication date 2018; 2018
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Varsava, Nina
Degree supervisor Landy, Joshua, 1965-
Degree supervisor Meyler, Bernadette
Thesis advisor Landy, Joshua, 1965-
Thesis advisor Meyler, Bernadette
Thesis advisor Kessler, Amalia D
Thesis advisor Satz, Debra
Degree committee member Kessler, Amalia D
Degree committee member Satz, Debra
Associated with Stanford University, Program in Modern Thought and Literature.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Nina Varsava.
Note Submitted to the Program in Modern Thought and Literature.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2018.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2018 by Nina Britt Varsava

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...