Quantentative and Squalortative

<a href="https://embed.stanford.edu/iframe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpurl.stanford.edu%2Fqk842bn7845" class="su-underline">Show Content</a>

Abstract/Contents

Abstract: This note joins warnings from Shakespeare and wordplay from James Joyce to critique the division of educational researchers into quantitative and qualitative camps. Beware the dichotomies we frame for each other, said Shakespeare. Break them down with humor, added Joyce. Unhelpful choices, falsely pitted against each other in a specific cultural context, are strengthened by participants picking sides or, sometimes worse, collapsing opposing sides into a compromised middle. Only a confrontation, in this case, humorous, with the conditions maintaining the opposition promises relief. Not this, not that, but "one aneither," said Joyce. Even the terms, quantitative or qualitative, must be discarded. Their mutual antagonism can grow better terms: quantentative and squalortative

Type of resource	text
Date created	2009

Author	McDermott, Ray
Author	McDermott, Meghan

Related Publication	McDermott, Ray and McDermott, Meghan. (2009). Quantentative and Squalortative. Mind, Culture and Activity 16(3): 203-208. DOI: 10.1080/10749030802295248
Related item	Title Published article
Location	https://purl.stanford.edu/qk842bn7845

Use and reproduction: User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Graduate School of Education Open Archive

Loading usage metrics...