Assessment framework for additive manufacturing in the AEC industry

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
For the foreseeable future, building components will be produced with additive (AM) and conventional manufacturing (CM) methods. Since the value of AM is currently not transparent to architects, engineers, and contractors, they cannot make well-informed decisions about the application of AM for buildings. Case studies of two metallic building components, a curtain wall frame and a bracket, carried out with a global building façade contractor demonstrated that AM is technologically feasible for building components and lowers environmental impact by up to 87% but increases cost by a factor of 5 at least. Based on the case studies, this research formalized a 19-step framework for the rapid and consistent assessment of the applicability (A) and schedule (S), environmental (E), and cost (C) implications of producing building components with AM vs. CM. The validation of the formalized semi-automated framework showed a 97% reduction of the effort required for the ASEC analyses and improved the consistency of the A, S, and C results across different assessors. The framework also improved the consistency of the E results in total by a factor of 4, but some E results remained inconsistent. An uncertainty analysis of these inconsistencies identified the uncertainty sources, quantified their impact, and proposed mitigations. A fuller automation of the framework could reduce the inconsistencies of the E analysis and further reduce the effort for ASEC assessment of AM vs. CM for buildings.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource.
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2018; ©2018
Publication date 2018; 2018
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Mrazovic, Natasa
Degree supervisor Fischer, Martin, 1960 July 11-
Thesis advisor Fischer, Martin, 1960 July 11-
Thesis advisor Bazjanac, Vladimir
Thesis advisor Billington, Sarah L. (Sarah Longstreth), 1968-
Thesis advisor Lepech, Michael
Degree committee member Bazjanac, Vladimir
Degree committee member Billington, Sarah L. (Sarah Longstreth), 1968-
Degree committee member Lepech, Michael
Associated with Stanford University, Civil & Environmental Engineering Department.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Natasa Mrazovic.
Note Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2018.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2018 by Natasa Mrazovic
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...