Stanford Digital Repository

"Not Just a Barcode": A Descriptive Analysis of Data Privacy Protection for Refugees Resettling in the United States

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Protecting the data privacy of refugees is important because unauthorized disclosure of refugees' sensitive information or coerced data collection can endanger their safety, well-being, and agency. This thesis evaluates the extent to which the US government, nonprofits, and international organizations protect refugees’ data privacy during refugee resettlement in the United States. Through analyzing relevant data privacy policies and in-depth interviews with both refugees and practitioners, I track the quality of nine key components of data privacy, stakeholder incentives and challenges in protecting refugee’s data privacy both in theory and in practice. This thesis finds that federal government actors are responsible for the most significant data privacy violations against resettled refugees, while international organizations have the most robust data privacy regulations. The lack of legal guarantee for refugees’ data privacy rights, meaningful barriers to informed consent, and over-retention of sensitive personal data present the most significant regulatory vulnerabilities. Unauthorized data access without consent, data security breaches, and inaccessibility of complaint systems comprise the most severe data privacy violations against US resettled refugees in practice. Interviews with refugees also suggest that power dynamics and lack of language accessibility create meaningful barriers that prevent refugees from objecting to unwanted information disclosure. Potential causes of data privacy violations against refugees (such as resource constraints), data-flow mapping, and policy recommendations identified in this thesis can inform future studies and policymakers to improve data privacy protection for a wider range of refugees in the future.

Description

Type of resource text
Date modified December 5, 2022
Publication date June 3, 2022; June 2, 2022

Creators/Contributors

Author Liu, Lily "Zimeng"
Thesis advisor Hainmueller, Jens
Degree granting institution Stanford University
Department Program in International Relations

Subjects

Subject Refugee data privacy
Subject Data privacy
Subject Informed consent (Medical law) > U.S. states
Subject Refugee resettlement
Subject Data protection
Subject Data protection > Government policy
Subject Migration, Internal > Social aspects
Subject Human rights
Subject Privacy
Subject Privacy Act of 1974 (United States)
Subject Data security
Subject Political refugees
Subject Asylum seeker
Subject United States. Office of Refugee Resettlement
Subject United States. Department of State
Subject U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Subject U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Subject United States. Department of Homeland Security
Subject Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (United States)
Subject Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Subject International Organization for Migration
Subject Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
Subject Data privacy policy
Subject Refugee surveillance
Subject Refugee privacy
Subject Nonprofit data privacy
Subject United States. Resettlement Administration
Subject U.S. resettlement agency
Subject Operation Allies Welcome
Subject Afghanistan
Subject Afghan refugee
Subject Humanitarian assistance
Subject Digital rights
Subject Reception and Placement
Subject Resettlement Support Center
Subject Data minimization
Subject GDPR
Subject Refugee interview
Subject International Rescue Committee
Subject Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service
Subject Non-governmental organizations
Subject Identity theft
Subject Refugee data protection
Subject Catholic Social Services (Mobile, Ala.). Refugee Resettlement Program
Genre Text
Genre Policy brief
Genre Thesis

Bibliographic information

Related item
Preferred citation
Westin, Alan. “Privacy And Freedom.” Washington and Lee Law Review 25, no. 1 (March 1,1968): 166.
Preferred citation
Witteborn, Saskia. “Data Privacy and Displacement: A Cultural Approach.” Journal of RefugeeStudies 34, no. 2 (March 12, 2020): 2291–2307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa004.
Preferred citation
Farraj, Achraf. “Refugees and the Biometrics Future: The Impact of Biometrics on Refugees and Asylum Seekers.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, no. 24 (2010): 891–941.
Preferred citation
Currion, Paul. “The Refugee Identity.” Caribou Digital (blog), March 25, 2018. https://medium.com/caribou-digital/the-refugee-identity-bfc60654229a.
Preferred citation
Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov. “Experimentation in Humanitarian Locations: UNHCR and Biometric Registration of Afghan Refugees.” Security Dialogue 46, no. 2 (April 1, 2015): 144–64.
Preferred citation
“On Humanitarian Refugee Biometrics and New Forms of Intervention.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11, no. 4 (October 2, 2017): 529–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1347856.
Preferred citation
2021): 507–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09483-2.Kaurin, Dragana. “Data Protection and Digital Agency for Refugees.” World Refugee Council. Centre for International Governance Innovation; World Refugee Council, May 15, 2019. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/data-protection-and-digital-agency-refugees/.
Preferred citation
Jiménez, Tomás R., and Marlene Orozco. “Prompts, Not Questions: Four Techniques for Crafting Better Interview Protocols.” Qualitative Sociology 44, no. 4 (December 1, 2021): 507–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09483-2.
Preferred citation
Hernandez Cantu, Barbara, Jeremy Weinstein, and Stanford University, Program in International Relations. “Domestic Politics of Data Privacy Laws in Latin America: A Descriptive Analysis.” Stanford University, Program in International Relations, Honors Theses, 2021. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/sw601pp1846.
Preferred citation
Hayes, Ben. “Migration and Data Protection: Doing No Harm in an Age of Mass Displacement, Mass Surveillance and ‘Big Data.’” International Review of the Red Cross 99, no. 904 (April 2017): 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383117000637.
Preferred citation
Guo, Eileen, and Hikmat Noori. “This Is the Real Story of the Afghan Biometric Databases Abandoned to the Taliban.” MIT Technology Review, August 30, 2021. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/08/30/1033941/afghanistan-biometric-database s-us-military-40-data-points/.
Preferred citation
Simko, Lucy, Ada Lerner, Samia Ibtasam, Franziska Roesner, and Tadayoshi Kohno. “Computer Security and Privacy for Refugees in the United States.” In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 409–23, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2018.00023.
Preferred citation
Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, and E. Tendayi Achiume. “Racial and Xenophobic Discrimination and the Use of Digital Technologies in Border and Immigration Enforcement.” United Nations Human Rights, Office of The High Commissioner, November 10, 2020. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f99b75728e98b061732d4a8/t/5fab946a5e6bfa61e 39ca33e/1605080175624/A-75-590-AUV_race-tech-borders.pdf.
Preferred citation
UN General Assembly. Statute of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, A/RES/428(V) § (1950). https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f0715c.html.
Preferred citation
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “Refworld | Guidance on the Protection of Personal Data of Persons of Concern to UNHCR.” UNHCR, August 2018.https://www.refworld.org/docid/5b360f4d4.html.
Preferred citation
Ly, Michelle. “Collective Privacy: Protecting Individuals in the Digital Age.” Stanford University, 2021.
Preferred citation
Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia. “Understanding Privacy Policies: Content, Self-Regulation, and Markets.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, January 3, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2736513.
Preferred citation
Molnar, Petra. “Technological Testing Grounds: Migration Management Experiments and Reflections from the Ground Up.” Privacy International; European Digital Rights; Refugee Law Lab, November 2020. https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Technological-Testing-Grounds.pdf.
Preferred citation
Immigration Statistics: A Story of Neglect. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985. https://www.nap.edu/read/593/chapter/8.
Preferred citation
GSMA Digital Identity Programme. “Refugees and Identity: Considerations for Mobile-Enabled Registration and Aid Delivery.” The GSMA Digital Identity Programme, GSMA Intelligence, UK aid, Department for International Development (DFID), 2017. https://data.gsmaintelligence.com/api-web/v2/research-file-download?id=28999750&file =Refugees%20and%20Identity%20Considerations%20for%20mobile-enabled%20registr ation%20and%20aid%20delivery.pdf.
Preferred citation
Executive Office of the President. “Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities, Executive Order 01768.” Federal Register, January 25, 2021. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01768/revision-of-civil-im migration-enforcement-policies-and-priorities.
Preferred citation
Behnam, Nicole, and Kristy Crabtree. “Big Data, Little Ethics: Confidentiality and Consent | Forced Migration Review.” Forced Migration Review, no. 61 (June 2019): 4–7.
Preferred citation
Bohlin, Anna. “Protection at the Cost of Privacy? - A Study of the Biometric Registration of Refugees.” FACULTY OF LAW University of Lund, 2008. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1556387&fileOId=1 563972.
Preferred citation
Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, and E. Tendayi Achiume. “Racial and Xenophobic Discrimination and the Use of Digital Technologies in Border and Immigration Enforcement.” United Nations Human Rights, Office of The High Commissioner, November 10, 2020. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f99b75728e98b061732d4a8/t/5fab946a5e6bfa61e 39ca33e/1605080175624/A-75-590-AUV_race-tech-borders.pdf.
Preferred citation
Pirlot de Corbion, Alexandrine, Gus Hosein, Tom Fisher, Ed Geraghty, Ailidh Callander, and Tina Bouffet. “The Humanitarian Metadata Problem:‘Doing No Harm’ In the Digital Era.” ICRC; Privacy International, October 2018. https://privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/2018-12/The%20Humanitarian%20Met adata%20Problem%20-%20Doing%20No%20Harm%20in%20the%20Digital%20Era.pd f.
Preferred citation
Witteborn, Saskia. “Data Privacy and Displacement: A Cultural Approach.” Journal of RefugeeStudies 34, no. 2 (March 12, 2020): 2291–2307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa004.
DOI https://doi.org/10.25740/jy336zh7440
Location https://purl.stanford.edu/jy336zh7440

Access conditions

Use and reproduction
User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY).

Preferred citation

Liu, L. (2022). "Not Just a Barcode": A Descriptive Analysis of Data Privacy Protection for Refugees Resettling in the United States. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at https://purl.stanford.edu/jy336zh7440

Collection

Stanford University, Program in International Relations, Honors Theses

View other items in this collection in SearchWorks

Contact information

lilyzimengliu@gmail.com
lilyzliu@stanford.edu

Also listed in

View in SearchWorks

Loading usage metrics...