The welfare Eeffects of macroeconomic trends in markdowns and technology

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
This dissertation consists of three essays on market power and technology. The first chapter assesses how changes in market power and technology have contributed to the decline of the share of national income paid out to workers. In particular, I jointly quantify the impact of markups, markdowns, and technology on the decline of the German labor share. I find that markdowns have steepened significantly over the last two decades. The estimated markdown trend explains more than half of the observed decline of the German labor share. A downward trend in the production elasticity of labor, consistent with factor substitution away from labor, accounts for the remainder. I find that markups have remained stable over the last two decades. I assess the welfare consequences of the observed markdown trend using a heterogeneous firm general equilibrium model. I find that the growing markdown wedge has been associated with consumption equivalent welfare losses of 2.9%. The second essay examines the economic implications of one particular technology, namely the technology to sell goods and services online. This chapter is jointly written with Liran Einav, Pete Klenow, Ben Klopack, Jon Levin, Larry Levin and Wayne Best. E-commerce represents a rapidly growing share of consumer spending in the U.S. We use transaction-level data on credit and debit cards from Visa, Inc. between 2007 and 2017 to quantify the resulting consumer surplus. We estimate that e-commerce spending reached 8% of consumption by 2017, yielding consumers the equivalent of a 1% permanent boost to their consumption, or over $1,000 per household per year. While some of the gains arose from avoiding travel costs of buying from local merchants, most of the gains stemmed from substituting to merchants available online but not locally. Higher income cardholders gained more, as did consumers in more densely populated counties. The third essay contributes to the methodological literature on the estimation of production technology. I assess the identification of Cobb-Douglas production functions in the presence of cross-sectional input price heterogeneity. I show that identification depends crucially on i) whether input prices are observed and ii) whether firms are price takers in the input market. I derive sufficient conditions for identification in the different environments and discuss when prices and lagged quantities are valid instruments. I find that lagged input quantities are generally not valid instruments for current quantities, even in the presence of cross-sectional price variation. Identification is especially challenging when prices are not observed, but can be restored if the exact input price process is known

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2020; ©2020
Publication date 2020; 2020
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Dolfen, Johannes Paul
Degree supervisor Klenow, Peter J
Thesis advisor Klenow, Peter J
Thesis advisor Bloom, Nick, 1973-
Thesis advisor Einav, Liran
Degree committee member Bloom, Nick, 1973-
Degree committee member Einav, Liran
Associated with Stanford University, Department of Economics.

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Johannes Paul Dolfen
Note Submitted to the Department of Economics
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2020
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2020 by Johannes Paul Dolfen
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...