Optimization of spacecraft architectures for earth-orbit satellite projects
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- Multiple-payload satellites in Earth orbit can be designed either as consolidated or distributed satellite systems. A consolidated satellite approach aggregates multiple payloads onto individual large satellites. A distributed (or 'disaggregated') satellite system allocates payloads across multiple smaller, heterogeneous satellites. U.S. space agencies have debated whether to move from consolidated to distributed systems for almost two decades. Two of the potential advantages of a distributed system include replacement of failed units more efficiently and insertion of new technologies more quickly and easily. Such a system may also be less vulnerable to adversarial threats. I create an approach to analyze the strategic choice between these satellite system-types. I model the value of a satellite program, and find optimal sequential decisions to choose and operate a particular satellite system. This model enables satellite architectures to be compared on the basis of certain equivalent, given a strategy that best-exploits the characteristics of each system alternative. This research finds that the choice between satellite architectures is highly sensitive to a decision maker's risk preference and the rate of technology advancement for payload instruments. This research is able to show that distributed satellite systems often provide greater value in programs that merit risk-averse decision making. Likewise, in scenarios where technology improves for payloads quickly year-over-year, distributed satellite systems often provide significantly more value than consolidated systems.
Description
Type of resource | text |
---|---|
Form | electronic; electronic resource; remote |
Extent | 1 online resource. |
Publication date | 2014 |
Issuance | monographic |
Language | English |
Creators/Contributors
Associated with | Daniels, Matthew Paul |
---|---|
Associated with | Stanford University, Department of Management Science and Engineering. |
Primary advisor | Paté-Cornell, M. Elisabeth (Marie Elisabeth) |
Thesis advisor | Paté-Cornell, M. Elisabeth (Marie Elisabeth) |
Thesis advisor | Close, Sigrid, 1971- |
Thesis advisor | Howard, Ronald A. (Ronald Arthur), 1934- |
Thesis advisor | Worden, Simon P |
Advisor | Close, Sigrid, 1971- |
Advisor | Howard, Ronald A. (Ronald Arthur), 1934- |
Advisor | Worden, Simon P |
Subjects
Genre | Theses |
---|
Bibliographic information
Statement of responsibility | Matthew Paul Daniels. |
---|---|
Note | Submitted to the Department of Management Science and Engineering. |
Thesis | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2014. |
Location | electronic resource |
Access conditions
- Copyright
- © 2014 by Matthew Paul Daniels
- License
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...