Loan loss measurement and bank lending

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
I use both theoretical and empirical models to assess how alternative measurement approaches to banks' loan loss allowances affect lending when banks are subject to regulatory capital requirements. I find that: (1) the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) method increases loan loss reserves on average by 16% relative to the Incurred Credit Loss (ICL) method; (2) the difference between CECL loan loss allowances and ICL loan loss allowances is larger in economic downturns than upswings; (3) banks reduce lending on average by 3.15% (50 basis points) when switching from ICL to CECL; and (4) CECL results in less procyclical lending than ICL, specifically, the difference between lending in up- vs. downturns decreases by 0.8% (37 basis points) when moving from ICL to CECL

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource
Extent 1 online resource
Place California
Place [Stanford, California]
Publisher [Stanford University]
Copyright date 2021; ©2021
Publication date 2021; 2021
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Author Huber, Stefan Johann
Degree supervisor Beyer, Anne
Thesis advisor Beyer, Anne
Thesis advisor Barth, Mary E
Thesis advisor Reiss, Peter C. (Peter Clemens)
Degree committee member Barth, Mary E
Degree committee member Reiss, Peter C. (Peter Clemens)
Associated with Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Subjects

Genre Theses
Genre Text

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Stefan Johann Huber
Note Submitted to the Gradaute School of Business
Thesis Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2021
Location https://purl.stanford.edu/hk996zw7122

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2021 by Stefan Johann Huber
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...