Evaluating Teacher Evaluation: What We Know about Value-Added Models and Other Methods
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
There is a widespread consensus among practitioners, researchers, and policy makers that current teacher evaluation systems in most school districts do little to help teachers improve or to support personnel decision making. For this reason, new approaches to teacher evaluation are being developed and tested.
There is also a growing consensus that evidence of teachers' contributions to student learning should be a component of teacher evaluation systems, along with evidence about the quality of teachers' practice. ""Value Added Models"" (VAMs), designed to evaluate student test score gains from one year to the next are often promoted as tools to accomplish this goal. Policy makers can benefit from research about what these models can and cannot do, as well as from research about the effects of other approaches to teacher evaluation. This brief addresses both of these important concerns.
Description
Type of resource | text |
---|---|
Date created | November 2011 |
Creators/Contributors
Author | Darling-Hammond, Linda | |
---|---|---|
Author | Beardsley, Audrey | |
Author | Haertel, Edward | |
Author | Rothstein, Jesse |
Subjects
Subject | Evaluating |
---|---|
Subject | Evaluation |
Subject | teacher |
Genre | Article |
Bibliographic information
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
- License
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).
Collection
Graduate School of Education Open Archive
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksContact information
- Contact
- openarchive@gse.stanford.edu
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...