Essays in energy and environmental economics

Abstract/Contents

Abstract

This dissertation consists of three essays in energy and environmental economics that all have a bearing on various concepts from public economics. The first essay uses fiscal data on 2,468 oil extraction agreements in 38 countries to study tax contracts between resource-rich countries and independent oil companies. We analyze why expropriations occur and what determines the degree of oil price exposure of host countries. We show theoretically and verify empirically that oil price insurance provided by tax contracts is increasing in a country's cost of expropriation, and decreasing in its production expertise. The second essay reveals significant unintended consequences from recent 14-state efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through emissions limits per mile from new cars. While such efforts significantly reduce emissions from new cars sold in the adopting states, they cause substantial emissions increases from new cars sold in other (non-adopting) states and from used cars. Such offsets (or "leakage") reflect interactions between the state-level and federal fuel-economy standards: the state-level efforts loosen the national standard, so that automakers can profitably increase sales of high-emissions vehicles in non-adopting states. Our simulation model estimates that leakage associated with recent legislation is 65-74%. In the third essay, I analyze speed limits. When choosing his speed, a driver faces a trade-off between private benefits (time savings) and private costs (fuel cost and own damage and injury). Driving faster also has external costs (pollution, adverse health impacts and injury to other drivers). I use large-scale speed limit increases in the western United States in 1987 and 1996 to address three related questions. First, do the social benefits of raising speed limits exceed the social (private plus external) costs? Second, do the private benefits of driving faster as a result of higher speed limits exceed the private costs? Third, could completely eliminating speed limits improve efficiency? I find that a 10 mph speed limit increase on highways leads to a 3-4 mph increase in travel speed, 9-15% more accidents, 34-60% more fatal accidents, and elevated pollutant concentrations of 14-25% (carbon monoxide), 9-16% (nitrogen oxides), 1-11% (ozone) and 9% higher fetal death rates around the affected freeways. I use these estimates to calculate private and external benefits and costs, and find that the social costs of speed limit increases are three to ten times larger than the social benefits. In contrast, many individual drivers would enjoy a net private benefit from driving faster. The substantial difference between private and social optimal speed choices provides a strong rationale for having speed limits.

Description

Type of resource	text
Form	electronic; electronic resource; remote
Extent	1 online resource.
Publication date	2012
Issuance	monographic
Language	English

Creators/Contributors

Associated with	Benthem, Arthur Alexius van
Associated with	Stanford University, Department of Economics
Primary advisor	Goulder, Lawrence H. (Lawrence Herbert)
Thesis advisor	Goulder, Lawrence H. (Lawrence Herbert)
Thesis advisor	Abramitzky, Ran
Thesis advisor	Harding, Matthew
Thesis advisor	Hoxby, Caroline Minter
Thesis advisor	Jacobsen, Mark R
Advisor	Abramitzky, Ran
Advisor	Harding, Matthew
Advisor	Hoxby, Caroline Minter
Advisor	Jacobsen, Mark R

Subjects

Genre	Theses

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility	Arthur Alexius van Benthem.
Note	Submitted to the Department of Economics.
Thesis	Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2012.
Location	electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright

© 2012 by Arthur Alexius van Benthem

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

View in SearchWorks

Loading usage metrics...