Conditional Decoupling Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- National human rights institutions, defined as domestic but globally legitimated agencies charged with promoting and protecting human rights, have emerged worldwide. This article examines the effect of these organizations on two kinds of human rights outcomes: physical integrity rights and civil and political rights. We analyze cross-national longitudinal data using regression models that account for the endogeneity of organizational formation. Our first main finding is that all types of human rights institutions improve long-term physical integrity outcomes but not civil and political rights practices. This finding may reflect a greater worldwide focus on physical integrity violations such as torture, and also many countries' propensity to resist Western civil and political rights standards. A second main finding is that time matters: in the cases we observe, initial increases in rated abuse levels were followed by improvements. These initial increases may be due to closer scrutiny or the expanded scope of what constitutes human rights abuses. Our results call for rethinking the concept of decoupling in the sociology of human rights and other focal areas.
Description
| Type of resource | text |
|---|---|
| Date created | August 2013 |
Creators/Contributors
| Author | Cole, Wade M. |
|---|---|
| Author | Ramirez, Francisco O. |
Subjects
| Subject | decoupling |
|---|---|
| Subject | Human rights |
| Subject | information paradox |
| Genre | Article |
Bibliographic information
| Related Publication | Cole, Wade M.; Ramirez, Francisco O. (2013). "Conditional Decoupling Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981 to 2004". American Sociological Review, 78(4): 702-725. DOI: 10.1177/0003122413492762 |
|---|---|
| Location | https://purl.stanford.edu/fj431vr5001 |
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
- License
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).
Collection
Graduate School of Education Open Archive
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksContact information
- Contact
- openarchive@gse.stanford.edu
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...