To dance at two weddings : Jews, nationalism, and the left in revolutionary Russia
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- Too embedded in the Jewish community for Russian historians, yet too firmly linked to the Russian Marxist movement for Jewish historians, the experience of the Russian Bund in 1917 has long been sadly neglected in historiography. To date, there has not been a single major study of the Bund's experience in the Russian Revolution, despite the party's prominence. In the first years of the twentieth century, the General Jewish Labor Bund was the largest workers' party in Russia. Vaulted into prominence in 1905 by its prominence in organizing communal defense against pogroms, the Bund emerged as one of the key political organizations active in the Jewish community of the Russian Empire. Even as the Bund's membership dwindled under pressure of post-Revolutionary repression, it remained a preeminent force on the Jewish street. Once the Revolution of 1917 allowed the Bund to return to the political stage, the Bund, now an autonomous party within the Menshevik's federated structure, found itself on the center stage of both Russian and Jewish politics during those pivotal months between the abdication of Nicholas II in February, and the Bolshevik Revolution in October. Using long inaccessible Soviet sources and documents in America and Israel, my dissertation provides a fuller understanding a party desperately trying to navigate its own contradictions in the midst of one of the great convulsions of the twentieth century. Founded in 1897 as a strictly Marxist party, the Bund was intended to mobilize Jewish workers within the Russian workers' movement. However, in response to Zionist competition, the pogroms of 1903-1906, and a general milieu of antisemitism ever-present in late-Imperial Russia, the identity of the party changed as members committed themselves to a controversial form of Marxist nationalism, hoping to secure Jewish cultural autonomy within a socialist federation. Initially opposed by all Russian Marxists, the Mensheviks quickly softened their criticism, but distance remained between the positions of the two parties. While the issues could be put aside in exile, the February Revolution of 1917 forced these issues to come to a head. Bundist leaders were forced to navigate this thorny issue while simultaneously confronting the incredible difficulties facing Revolutionary Russia, including, but not limited to, hostile invading armies, economic collapse, and severe social disruption caused by war and revolution. The Bund defined the interaction between Jews and Russia's Revolution. It was through the Bund that Jews encountered the Revolution, and through the Bund that Russia's Revolutionaries came to understand Russia's Jews and other minorities. Pursuing a distinctly Bundist agenda, this party lay the foundation for national-autonomy in Russia and anticipated the eventual structure of the Soviet Union. Menshevik support proved crucial to allowing the Bund to overcome fierce opposition from within the Jewish community from Zionist and Orthodox organization, who had the support of the majority on the Jewish street. However, tensions often arose between Bundists and Mensheviks, as the federation became increasingly untenable even before the Bolshevik seizure of power delivered the decisive blows. The Bund's experience illuminates new facets of the Russian Revolution long occluded from historical view. Moreover, it represents the first Jewish engagement with modern politics, an occurrence that coincided with those pivotal months that would define so much of the twentieth century. Trapped poignantly between competing ideas, the Bund's story is vital to understanding the Jewish Revolutionary experience.
Description
| Type of resource | text |
|---|---|
| Form | electronic resource; remote; computer; online resource |
| Extent | 1 online resource. |
| Place | California |
| Place | [Stanford, California] |
| Publisher | [Stanford University] |
| Copyright date | 2018; ©2018 |
| Publication date | 2018; 2018 |
| Issuance | monographic |
| Language | English |
Creators/Contributors
| Author | Meyers, Joshua |
|---|---|
| Degree supervisor | Rodrigue, Aron |
| Degree supervisor | Zipperstein, Steven J, 1950- |
| Thesis advisor | Rodrigue, Aron |
| Thesis advisor | Zipperstein, Steven J, 1950- |
| Thesis advisor | Naimark, Norman M |
| Thesis advisor | Safran, Gabriella, 1967- |
| Thesis advisor | Weiner, Amir, 1961- |
| Degree committee member | Naimark, Norman M |
| Degree committee member | Safran, Gabriella, 1967- |
| Degree committee member | Weiner, Amir, 1961- |
| Associated with | Stanford University, Department of History. |
Subjects
| Genre | Theses |
|---|---|
| Genre | Text |
Bibliographic information
| Statement of responsibility | Joshua Meyers. |
|---|---|
| Note | Submitted to the Department of History. |
| Thesis | Thesis Ph.D. Stanford University 2018. |
| Location | electronic resource |
Access conditions
- Copyright
- © 2018 by Joshua Meyers
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...