TR192: Design Exploration Assessment Methodology: Testing the Guidance of Design Processes
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the Design Exploration Assessment Methodology (DEAM) for comparing the impact of differences in process on outcome for given design problems. Current practice fails to reliably generate high performing alternatives in part because it lacks systematic means to compare existing or emerging design processes. Researchers lack empirical methods and data to evaluate design challenges and the strategies available to address them. In this paper we document, and then apply DEAM to professional implementation of six design strategies across two design challenges using the charrette test method. Results compare strategies according to the performance of the solution(s) generated. For the strategies and challenges investigated, more information during design does not always assist the designer to produce better performing alternatives. We discuss possible explanations, and conclude with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of DEAM as an evaluation method. Initial findings demonstrate that DEAM is a method capable of providing meaningful comparison of strategies in the domain of energy efficient design challenges.
Description
Type of resource | text |
---|---|
Date created | June 2010 |
Creators/Contributors
Author | Clevenger, Caroline | |
---|---|---|
Author | Haymaker, John | |
Author | Ehrich, Andrew |
Subjects
Subject | CIFE |
---|---|
Subject | Center for Integrated Facility Engineering |
Subject | Stanford University |
Subject | Challenge |
Subject | creativity |
Subject | Design Theory |
Subject | Exploration |
Subject | Guidance |
Subject | Strategy |
Genre | Technical report |
Bibliographic information
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
Preferred citation
- Preferred Citation
- Clevenger, Caroline and Haymaker, John and Ehrich, Andrew. (2010). TR192: Design Exploration Assessment Methodology: Testing the Guidance of Design Processes. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/dh230rt8010
Collection
CIFE Publications
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksContact information
- Contact
- cife-email@stanford.edu
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...