Threat and polarization : social identity and bias among American partisans

Placeholder Show Content

Abstract/Contents

Abstract
Recent research in political communication has defined polarization in affective terms (how partisans feel toward their opponents), as opposed to ideological terms (position on a left-right spectrum). This progression has enabled researchers to demonstrate that contempt between Democrats and Republicans has increased over the past half-century, as well as to document extant levels of attitudinal and behavioral biases between party opponents. The original research in this dissertation relies on this definition to examine how the psychological mechanisms of threat and affirmation affect interparty bias. Studies 1 and 2 give evidence of self and group-threat's ability to exacerbate partisan bias, while no support was found for affirmation's hypothesized attenuating effect. Study 3 was unable to provide evidence of a threat response among Democrats following the 2016 presidential election.

Description

Type of resource text
Form electronic; electronic resource; remote
Extent 1 online resource.
Publication date 2017
Issuance monographic
Language English

Creators/Contributors

Associated with Blascovich, Gregory Major
Associated with Stanford University, Department of Communication.
Primary advisor Iyengar, Shanto
Thesis advisor Iyengar, Shanto
Thesis advisor Bailenson, Jeremy
Thesis advisor Hancock, Jeff
Thesis advisor McDermott, Rose, 1962-
Advisor Bailenson, Jeremy
Advisor Hancock, Jeff
Advisor McDermott, Rose, 1962-

Subjects

Genre Theses

Bibliographic information

Statement of responsibility Gregory Major Blascovich.
Note Submitted to the Department of Communication.
Thesis Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2017.
Location electronic resource

Access conditions

Copyright
© 2017 by Gregory Major Blascovich
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC).

Also listed in

Loading usage metrics...