Civic Online Reasoning: Curriculum Evaluation
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
Introduction
In a digital age, being an informed citizen draws on the ability to locate trustworthy information and determine its reliability. Sites of varied quality flood our screens. Can young people today tell fact from fiction online? Can they distinguish between dubious and credible sources? Recent evidence suggests not. In 2018 and 2019, our team administered an assessment of online reasoning to 3,446 high school students across the country and found they were vexed by even basic evaluations of digital sources.A Different Approach
How can we help students become smarter consumers of digital information? To develop a roadmap, we observed fact checkers at the nation’s leading news outlets and distilled their strategies into an instructional approach we call Civic Online Reasoning (COR)—the ability to search for, evaluate, and verify social and political information.MediaWise
In 2018, the Stanford History Education Group (SHEG) teamed with the Poynter Institute and the Local Media Association to create MediaWise, an initiative supported by Google.org. We worked alongside classroom teachers to develop curriculum for teaching the skills of Civic Online Reasoning. A pilot study in a Northern California school district showed modest but promising gains. We fine-tuned our approach and then conducted a full-scale experiment with students in a large Midwestern school district. Compared with students in regular classrooms, students in COR classrooms improved significantly in their ability to evaluate online sources.COR Curriculum
The COR curriculum is available for free at cor.stanford.edu. The suite of lessons can be implemented as a full curriculum or taught as a series of stand-alone lessons. Our materials are accompanied by instructional videos introducing the approach, easy-to-use assessments for tracking students’ progress, and a ten-episode video series, Navigating Digital Information, by noted author and YouTube star John Green.What’s at Stake
The threat to democracy from a digitally credulous citizenry is nothing less than an issue of national defense. Facing this challenge will require a renewed educational commitment that acknowledges the depth of the problem and meets it with vigor and resolve. We offer this curriculum as a start in that direction.
Description
Type of resource | text |
---|---|
Date created | December 4, 2019 |
Creators/Contributors
Author | Wineburg, Sam | |
---|---|---|
Author | Breakstone, Joel | |
Author | Smith, Mark | |
Author | McGrew, Sarah | |
Author | Ortega, Teresa |
Subjects
Subject | civic online reasoning |
---|---|
Subject | media literacy |
Subject | digital literacy |
Subject | inquiry |
Subject | curriculum |
Subject | assessment |
Subject | social studies |
Subject | Graduate School of Education |
Subject | Stanford History Education Group |
Genre | Article |
Bibliographic information
Related item | |
---|---|
Location | https://purl.stanford.edu/xr124mv4805 |
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.
- License
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC-ND).
Preferred citation
- Preferred Citation
- Sam Wineburg, Joel Breakstone, Mark Smith, Sarah McGrew, and Teresa Ortega. “Civic Online Reasoning: Curriculum Evaluation” (working paper 2019-A2, Stanford History Education Group, Stanford University, Stanford, 2019).
Collection
Graduate School of Education Open Archive
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksContact information
- Contact
- breakstone@stanford.edu
Also listed in
Loading usage metrics...