Philosophy Talk. Repugnant Markets: Should Everything Be for Sale?
Abstract/Contents
- Abstract
- We might ban buying or selling horse meat in the US not for the protection of horses, but because we find it morally repugnant. Yet this moral repugnance is clearly not universal, and on some level may even be arbitrary, given France's attitude towad horse meat. What role, if any, should moral repugnance play in determining the rules of our marketplaces? Even if we want to eliminate the influence of moral repugnance, can we? Debra and Ken hold their noses with Nobel Prize-winning economist Al Roth, author of Who Gets What ― and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design.
Description
Type of resource | sound recording-nonmusical |
---|---|
Form | podcasts |
Extent | 1 audio file |
Place | KALW (Radio station : San Francisco, Calif.)California |
Date created | June 3, 2018 |
Language | English |
Digital origin | born digital |
Track configuration | Stereo |
Creators/Contributors
Speaker | Taylor, Kenneth Allen, 1954-2019 | |
---|---|---|
Speaker | Landy, Joshua, 1965- | |
Speaker | Satz, Debra | |
Speaker | Roth, Alvin E., 1951- |
Subjects
Subject | Ethics |
---|---|
Subject | Free enterprise |
Genre | Radio talk shows |
Bibliographic information
philosophytalk.org show page | |
---|---|
Finding Aid |
|
Show# | 460.0 |
Location | https://purl.stanford.edu/vb345df6177 |
Location | SC1118 |
Repository | Stanford University. Libraries. Department of Special Collections and University Archives |
Access conditions
- Use and reproduction
- These files may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without permission. For permission requests, please contact Philosophy Talk (http://philosophytalk.org/contact).
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved.
Collection
Philosophy Talk, 2002-
View other items in this collection in SearchWorksAlso listed in
Loading usage metrics...